網路小鋼砲 - TP-Link TL-WR741ND 開箱(下)
作者:Aven 日期:2011-06-28 16:45
CPU and memory benchmark
韌體：DD-WRT v24-sp2 (11/21/10) std
Total time: 23.8s
Overhead for getting time: 15us Time to run memory bench: 4.08[secs] Time to run computation of pi (2400 digits, 10 times): 9.56[secs] Time to run computation of e (9009 digits): 9.61[secs] Time to run float bench: 0.59[secs] Total time: 23.8s
網路效能
測試環境：
Server：Synology DS211 NAS
PC：ASUS EeeBOX B204 Windows XP
Firewall：disable
韌體版本：3.9.19 Build 100312 Rel.36350n
LAN to LAN：93.3Mbps
C:NBD>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1912] local 192.168.1.101 port 2464 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.101 port 2465 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.101 port 2466 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.101 port 2467 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.101 port 2468 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.3 Mbits/sec
WLAN to LAN：88.5Mbps
C:NBD>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1880] local 192.168.1.102 port 2577 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.102 port 2579 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.102 port 2575 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.102 port 2576 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.102 port 2578 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.0 sec 139 MBytes 19.5 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.0 sec 130 MBytes 18.2 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.0 sec 111 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.0 sec 146 MBytes 20.4 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 107 MBytes 14.9 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 634 MBytes 88.5 Mbits/sec
LAN to WAN：93.2Mbps
C:NBD>iperf -c 192.168.2.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1848] local 192.168.1.101 port 1937 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.101 port 1934 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.101 port 1936 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.101 port 1933 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.101 port 1935 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.2 Mbits/sec
WAN to LAN：94.2Mbps
DiskStation> iperf -c 192.168.2.249 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.249, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 212 KByte (WARNING: requested 128 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 7] local 192.168.2.70 port 45315 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.2.70 port 45311 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 4] local 192.168.2.70 port 45312 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.2.70 port 45313 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.2.70 port 45314 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 6] 0.0-60.0 sec 132 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-60.0 sec 139 MBytes 19.4 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 7] 0.0-60.1 sec 138 MBytes 19.2 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 674 MBytes 94.2 Mbits/sec
彙總整理
優點：
1.代理商提供三年保固，六個月內故障就換新。
2.具簡易頻寬管理功能，可針對特定IP進行上傳及下載的頻寬管理(QoS)。
3.原廠配備 5dBi 全向天線，誠意十足。
缺點：
實在想不出來有什麼缺點，以下為硬擠出來的，各位看看就好...
1.不能刷Tomato。(這是它的錯嗎?)
2.白色機身不耐髒。(這是什麼理由..)
3.沒有雙天線。(請多花點錢買 WR841ND 吧!)
最後總結一下，WR741ND 搭載美商 Atheros AR7240 晶片，各項實測網路傳輸效能出乎意料的好，NAT 效能幾乎已達Fast Ethernet 的極限值，無線網路傳輸效能也達到應有的水準，"網路小鋼砲"的頭銜絕非浪得虛名。在功能面，原廠韌體即已提供頻寬管理(QoS)功能及基本的網路安全控管，此外出廠即配備的 5dBi 天線，也省去了額外花錢換天線的困擾。寫到這裡，相信大多數的人都同意 WR741ND 的CP值超高，以千元等級的預算可以買到如此規格的 Router 真的物超所值。如果近期家裡有考慮升級 50M 甚至打算直上 100M 上網的朋友，若擔心現有 Router 的 NAT 笑能效能不足以無法應付大水管，相信 TP-Link TL-WR741ND 應該不會讓您失望才對。
延伸閱讀：
[兄弟鬩牆] ASUS RT-N10 / RT-N10+ 超級比一比
D-Link DIR-300 A1 & B1 超級比一比
