天生反骨 專為開放平台而生的 Netgear WNR3500L 開箱評測(下)
作者: Aven 日期: 2010-12-17 00:49
CPU and memory benchmark
Total time: 19.0s
root@wnr3500l:/jffs# ./cpubench Overhead for getting time: 32us Time to run memory bench: 2.73[secs] Time to run computation of pi (2400 digits, 10 times): 6.64[secs] Time to run computation of e (9009 digits): 6.80[secs] Time to run float bench: 2.79[secs] Total time: 19.0s
網路效能
測試環境:
Server:QNAP TS-419U gigabit NAS
PC:ASUS EeeBOX gigabit
Firewall:disable
Jumbo Frame:disable
LAN to LAN:737Mbps
C:NBD>iperf -c 192.168.2.60 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.60, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1896] local 192.168.2.211 port 3434 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.2.211 port 3435 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.2.211 port 3436 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.2.211 port 3437 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.2.211 port 3433 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.0 sec 1.04 GBytes 148 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.0 sec 1.02 GBytes 146 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.0 sec 1.05 GBytes 151 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.0 sec 1.02 GBytes 146 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.0 sec 1.03 GBytes 147 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.0 sec 5.15 GBytes 737 Mbits/sec
WLAN to LAN:91Mbps
C:NBD>iperf -c 192.168.2.60 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.60, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1912] local 192.168.2.211 port 4870 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.2.211 port 4872 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.2.211 port 4871 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.2.211 port 4873 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.2.211 port 4874 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 129 MBytes 17.9 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 129 MBytes 18.0 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 128 MBytes 17.9 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 651 MBytes 91.0 Mbits/sec
LAN to WAN:410Mbps
C:NBD>iperf -c 192.168.2.60 -w 128k -t 60 -P 3 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.60, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1880] local 192.168.1.210 port 3856 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.210 port 3854 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.210 port 3855 connected with 192.168.2.60 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1880] 0.0-60.0 sec 976 MBytes 136 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.0 sec 992 MBytes 139 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.0 sec 966 MBytes 135 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.0 sec 2.87 GBytes 410 Mbits/sec
WAN to LAN:565Mbps
# iperf -c 192.168.2.10 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.10, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 212 KByte (WARNING: requested 128 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local 192.168.2.60 port 48577 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.2.60 port 48578 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.2.60 port 48579 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.2.60 port 48576 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 7] local 192.168.2.60 port 48580 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0-60.0 sec 818 MBytes 114 Mbits/sec [ 7] 0.0-60.0 sec 736 MBytes 103 Mbits/sec [ 4] 0.0-60.0 sec 678 MBytes 94.8 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 682 MBytes 95.4 Mbits/sec [ 6] 0.0-60.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 157 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.0 sec 3.95 GBytes 565 Mbits/sec
USB readyshare 網芳效能
測試環境:
Server:WNR3500L + USB 40GB HD NTFS
PC:ASUS EeeBOX(Windows XP home)
檔案格式:AVI 電影檔1488.2MB
寫入速度:7.54MB/s,讀取速度:4.99MB/s
心得
這一台 Netgear WNR3500L 評測過程相當長,從拿到 sample 機到評測報告出爐,將近一個月的時間,雖然這段時間雜務較多,但是 WNR3500L 像是魔術師的高筒帽,一會變出 Tomato, 一會又變出 DD-WRT,再伸手一刷又是另外一個驚奇。由官方主動參與支持的開放社群及眾多第三方韌體的支援,造就 WNR3500L 天生反骨的性格,如此開放硬體平台的特性已在國外受到廣大網友的喜愛,網友終於可以光明正大的刷用第三方韌體,不必再擔心原廠保固問題。此外,網路效能實測結果與 ASUS RT-N16 互有領先,特別是在 WLAN to LAN 項目有大幅度的領先,證明 Netgear 在這部份有下過功夫。實測結果雖不若同門師兄弟 WNDR3700 般被冠上地球最強 AP 的稱號,但 WNR3500L 俱備開放硬體平台的特性,在國外受歡迎的程度更勝於WNDR3700。
在 網通產業的山寨傳奇 一文作者曾經提到:提供第三方韌體的網通產品有一定市場存在。這句話筆者已深深地感受到,相信國內網通大廠應該也能明白。這幾年 SoC 技術日新月異,網路硬體廠商為求快速商品佈局,大多依照 SoC 廠商提供的公版電路來製造生產,使得各家產品彼此的差異日趨模糊,因此商業競爭的結果往往只剩下價格上的廝殺。換個角度來看,因使用開放源碼或廣泛支持第三方韌體的網路產品,其實就是一種差異化,這個差異化可以為網路硬體廠商從網路社群中直接或間接得到利益,無論是更多的產品銷售,或者是使用者自成的產品粉絲團,持續的對硬體產品提供改善意見回饋,同時創造出網路硬體廠商、網友及開放社群三贏的局面。這樣的模式,我們在 Netgear WNR3500L 及 MyOpenRouter 的合作模式裡已經得到印證,國內網通大廠亦可以取為借鏡。
參考資料:
http://www.netgear.com/
http://www.myopenrouter.com/
台灣地區總代理-瀚錸科技:http://www.netbridgetech.com.tw/
引用資料:
網通產業的山寨傳奇
https://www.nikeairforceones.us.org/
https://www.jordan24.us/
https://www.airjordan33.us/
https://www.nikecortezshox.us.org/
https://www.christianslouboutin.us.org/
https://www.nikeoffwhite.us.org/
https://www.cheapjordanshoessuppliers.us.org/
https://www.nikeoutletstoreonlines.us.org/
https://www.nmdr1.us.com/
https://www.newnikesneakers.us.org/
https://www.nikewholesalesuppliers.us.com/
https://www.pandorajewelryshops.us.com/
https://www.nikeair-max95.us.com/
https://www.nikerosheblazers.us.com/
https://www.jordan31.us/
https://www.newnikesshoes.us.org/
https://www.pandoraoutletsjewelry.us.com/
https://www.shoesstores.ca/
https://www.shoeswholesalesuppliers.us/
https://www.diorjordans.u